Philip
Donor
IOTL Flavius Anastasius was named Emperor of Rome in 491. However, in 488 he was considered, based on his knowledge of religious matters, for appointment as the Patriarch of Antioch. So, what if he had been made Patriarch of Antioch?
What happens to the (Eastern) Roman Empire? Who would become emperor? I guess butterflies could allow Zeno the Younger to live longer and achieve the purple. Who else is in the mix, is there any chance that person could accomplish the same reforms as Anastasius? Long term, the butterflies likely carry off any chance of Justinian arising, but what about the shorter term?
What happens to the Church? Is having a committed Hesitant Monophysite who is willing to compromise in Antioch really that different than having a mild Chalcedonian willing to compromise there?
What happens to the (Eastern) Roman Empire? Who would become emperor? I guess butterflies could allow Zeno the Younger to live longer and achieve the purple. Who else is in the mix, is there any chance that person could accomplish the same reforms as Anastasius? Long term, the butterflies likely carry off any chance of Justinian arising, but what about the shorter term?
What happens to the Church? Is having a committed Hesitant Monophysite who is willing to compromise in Antioch really that different than having a mild Chalcedonian willing to compromise there?