the conflict with Britain was in fact Plan B, due to Chile's ginormous border that meant BA had to settle the Beagle Conflict after it almost went "hot""First we will kill all the subversives; then we will kill their collaborators; afterwards their sympathizers; right after that, those who remain neutral; and, finally, we will kill the fainthearted"
--Brig. Gen. Ibérico Saint-Jean
Right--but would he be more aggressive in helping Britain, or simply loom over Argentina with a Big Stick?Carter was all about human rights, so there's no way his administration would help a bloodthirsty junta like Argentina's. The war would go as it did IOTL.
Right!And getting Jeane Kirkpatrick out of the equation is not going to help the Junta...
I wonder if Argentina would be inclined to think that they could get away with the Falklands invasion without Kirkpatrick around, and a president that cared more about human rights.the conflict with Britain was in fact Plan B, due to Chile's ginormous border that meant BA had to settle the Beagle Conflict after it almost went "hot"
Probably the former.Right--but would he be more aggressive in helping Britain, or simply loom over Argentina with a Big Stick?
The war was a desperate final gamble, so I could see the junta still invading anyway. Plus, Thatcher will still cut defense spending.I wonder if Argentina would be inclined to think that they could get away with the Falklands invasion without Kirkpatrick around, and a president that cared more about human rights.
ThisCarter was all about human rights, so there's no way his administration would help a bloodthirsty junta like Argentina's. The war would go as it did IOTL.
Yes, but the Reagan administration used the Argentinian Military for its proxy wars in Centro America. This brought the Argentinian Army very close to the Pentagon. Galtieri had a lot of personal relations in Washington and this not being is surely going to affect the equation.The war was a desperate final gamble, so I could see the junta still invading anyway. Plus, Thatcher will still cut defense spending.
As if I didn't have enough reasons to dislike the man already.Yes, but the Reagan administration used the Argentinian Military for its proxy wars in Centro America. This brought the Argentinian Army very close to the Pentagon. Galtieri had a lot of personal relations in Washington and this not being is surely going to affect the equation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Charly they were the first to try and wrangle together the (and that meant the advantage of keeping Operation Condor's hangmen several countries away whenever a White House or UN delegation came by)Yes, but the Reagan administration used the Argentinian Military for its proxy wars in Centro America. This brought the Argentinian Army very close to the Pentagon. Galtieri had a lot of personal relations in Washington and this not being is surely going to affect the equation.
They were quietly put in plane back homehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Charly they were the first to try and wrangle together the (and that meant the advantage of keeping Operation Condor's hangmen several countries away whenever a White House or UN delegation came by)
Argentinean Navy officers also collected ransom money for people they knew had already been murdered back home, ran assassinations from the Embassy in Paris, and even freed Peronists to sabotage Gibraltar (though they were arrested by the Spanish and taken to a bar)
At the end of the day we are still talking about NATO airstrip one in 1982....UK would presumably get given the toys (testing is always usefully anyway for US as well) by the pentagon who ever was in the White House?Carter would be very bad for the British. His focus would be trying to end the war, not for the British to win it. I doubt the U.S. would've provided the logistical support it gave Britain. After an initial effort at mediation the U.S. was all in helping Britain. The U.S. shared satellite intel, provided Stinger Missiles, and rushed AIM-9L Sidewinders to the RN Harrier Fleet. Without that help the war would've been a lot harder. 21 of 23 Harrier kills were achieved with the new AIM-9L which was far more lethal than the earlier model than in use.
More of that coming...Muses have been good, and I posted on three timelines in 2 days. ThanksBy the way I am usually accused of being and old Conservative, and to be true so I am. And still I hate the night Reagan defeated Carter (and, not only because of it, I am addicted to @NHBL "The Masquerade Thread II")
(If you think modern times are nasty you should have to remember the Seventies and Eighties)