29 January, 1844: The end of polygamy
The election of 1844 set in motion a new direction for the United States. A direction that would of course be fraught with peril in its own right, but would lead to a transformation like no other. This change would be set in motion by one man: Joseph Smith Jr.
To say that the eleventh President of the United States was a divisive figure prior to his election into office and even during his tenure is a gross understatement. His founding of the Latter-Day Saint Movement had not made him popular by any stretch and many accusations, some true some not circulated around him. The fact that he won the election is oft considered a historical miracle. One largely attributed to his oratory skills as well as that of those who campaigned for him.
29 January, 1844, Nauvoo Illinois:
Joseph Smith Jr., President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints smiled as he looked at the faces in the mayor's office. It had been decided that he would make a run for the highest office in the land. The Presidency of the United States. “I don't expect to carry Missouri.” The comment brought a laugh to the room despite the painful memories of what their faith had gone through in that state. Once the brief moment of levity had passed Smith's face turned somber. “This is not a step I take lightly. It is something I have prayed a great deal about. As a result of my prayers the Lord has seen fit to give me a new revelation: We are to cease the practice of plural marriage at once and dissolve all existing marriages of that nature.”
The room was silent for a moment before Brigham Young, President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles spoke up. “Brother Joseph, it was you who taught that doctrine. Surely it was divinely inspired. Why would the Lord command us to cease?”
“Brother Brigham, the wisdom of the Lord is far beyond the confines of man. Such practices have their time and place. The Bible teaches that great patriarchs took part in the practice such as Abraham and Jacob, among others. The fact that such unions have been divinely appointed in the past is not in dispute.
“The truth is that we were hasty in our application of the practice. A time may come when it will need to be implemented again, but this is not the time nor the place. The people of this nation frown on the practice and to continue will only harm our church. So sayeth the Lord. He has spoken and we must obey. Though brethren I also council you that we do this quietly. Drawing attention to it will do us no favors.”
So to explain the point of divergence here. Basically Joseph Smith ends polygamy in the LDS church forty-six years early and nullifies all previous plural marriages. The idea is that this practice being a large part of what was criticized in the Nauvoo Expositor, that it being done away with butterflies that incident and thus his assassination. Thus allowing him to finish his campaign for, and ultimately win the Presidency in 1844.
Is this implausible? Yes. Before people claim that this should be in ASB though let me point out this post that outlines what should and shouldn't be in ASB. This does not fit the criteria for ASB. That said I welcome any help to keep this timeline as plausible as possible. Starting of course with the campaign trail.
Thank you in advance for your readership and help. I'm well aware we're dealing with a divisive figure in Joseph Smith, please keep discussion civil.
To say that the eleventh President of the United States was a divisive figure prior to his election into office and even during his tenure is a gross understatement. His founding of the Latter-Day Saint Movement had not made him popular by any stretch and many accusations, some true some not circulated around him. The fact that he won the election is oft considered a historical miracle. One largely attributed to his oratory skills as well as that of those who campaigned for him.
29 January, 1844, Nauvoo Illinois:
Joseph Smith Jr., President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints smiled as he looked at the faces in the mayor's office. It had been decided that he would make a run for the highest office in the land. The Presidency of the United States. “I don't expect to carry Missouri.” The comment brought a laugh to the room despite the painful memories of what their faith had gone through in that state. Once the brief moment of levity had passed Smith's face turned somber. “This is not a step I take lightly. It is something I have prayed a great deal about. As a result of my prayers the Lord has seen fit to give me a new revelation: We are to cease the practice of plural marriage at once and dissolve all existing marriages of that nature.”
The room was silent for a moment before Brigham Young, President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles spoke up. “Brother Joseph, it was you who taught that doctrine. Surely it was divinely inspired. Why would the Lord command us to cease?”
“Brother Brigham, the wisdom of the Lord is far beyond the confines of man. Such practices have their time and place. The Bible teaches that great patriarchs took part in the practice such as Abraham and Jacob, among others. The fact that such unions have been divinely appointed in the past is not in dispute.
“The truth is that we were hasty in our application of the practice. A time may come when it will need to be implemented again, but this is not the time nor the place. The people of this nation frown on the practice and to continue will only harm our church. So sayeth the Lord. He has spoken and we must obey. Though brethren I also council you that we do this quietly. Drawing attention to it will do us no favors.”
So to explain the point of divergence here. Basically Joseph Smith ends polygamy in the LDS church forty-six years early and nullifies all previous plural marriages. The idea is that this practice being a large part of what was criticized in the Nauvoo Expositor, that it being done away with butterflies that incident and thus his assassination. Thus allowing him to finish his campaign for, and ultimately win the Presidency in 1844.
Is this implausible? Yes. Before people claim that this should be in ASB though let me point out this post that outlines what should and shouldn't be in ASB. This does not fit the criteria for ASB. That said I welcome any help to keep this timeline as plausible as possible. Starting of course with the campaign trail.
Thank you in advance for your readership and help. I'm well aware we're dealing with a divisive figure in Joseph Smith, please keep discussion civil.
Last edited: